Secondary Burden Impact on Current Transformer Accuracy Classes: Mechanism Analysis and Calibration Strategy

2026-03-02

Executive Summary

Secondary burden is a critical but often overlooked parameter affecting current transformer accuracy. Excessive burden causes ratio error and phase displacement to exceed specified limits, leading to metering inaccuracies and protection misoperation. This technical note examines burden effects on accuracy classes and provides calculation and calibration strategies.

Understanding Secondary Burden

Definition

Secondary burden is the total impedance connected to the CT secondary terminals, expressed in ohms (Ω) or volt-amperes (VA) at rated secondary current.

Burden Components

Burden Calculation

Total burden (Ω): Z_b = Z_relay + Z_cable + Z_connections

Cable resistance: R_cable = ρ × L / A

Example: 50m of 4mm² cable (round-trip: 100m)

Impact on Accuracy Classes

Metering CTs (Class 0.2, 0.5, 1.0)

Burden Condition Ratio Error Limit Phase Displacement Limit
At rated burden Per class (e.g., ±0.2% for 0.2S) Per class (e.g., ±10 min for 0.2S)
At 25-100% rated burden Must remain within class limits Must remain within class limits
Exceeding rated burden Errors increase proportionally Errors increase proportionally

Key point: Metering CTs are typically specified at 25-100% of rated burden. Operating outside this range voids accuracy guarantees.

Protection CTs (Class 5P, 10P)

Protection CTs are specified at rated accuracy limit current (e.g., 5P20 = 20× rated current):

Burden Error Mechanisms

1. Ratio Error Increase

Higher burden requires higher secondary voltage to drive the same current. This increases magnetizing current, which does not contribute to secondary output, causing negative ratio error (secondary current lower than expected).

Formula: ε_ratio ≈ (I_mag / I_secondary) × 100%

2. Phase Displacement Increase

Magnetizing current lags the secondary current by approximately 90°. As burden increases and magnetizing current increases, the phase angle between primary and secondary current shifts.

Impact: Critical for power metering (affects kWh measurement) and directional protection (affects torque angle).

3. Saturation Risk

Higher burden reduces the margin to saturation. For protection CTs, this can cause premature saturation during fault conditions.

Burden Specification Guidelines

Standard Burden Values (IEC 61869-2)

Rated Output Standard Burden (5A secondary) Typical Application
2.5 VA 0.1Ω Modern digital meters/relays, short cables
5 VA 0.2Ω General metering, moderate cable length
10 VA 0.4Ω Protection CTs, longer cables
15 VA 0.6Ω Protection CTs, long cables or multiple devices
20 VA 0.8Ω High-burden applications, analog instruments
30 VA 1.2Ω Special applications, very long cables

Selecting Rated Output

  1. Calculate actual burden: Sum all components (relay + cable + connections)
  2. Apply safety margin: Select CT with rated output ≥ 1.5 × actual burden
  3. Verify accuracy: Ensure accuracy class is maintained at actual burden

Example:

Cable Sizing Optimization

Cable Cross-Section Selection

Cable Length (round-trip) Minimum Cross-Section Resistance at 75°C
≤ 50m 2.5 mm² 0.42Ω
50-100m 4 mm² 0.53Ω
100-200m 6 mm² 0.53Ω
200-300m 10 mm² 0.53Ω
>300m Consider 1A secondary

1A vs 5A Secondary

For long cable runs, 1A secondary reduces burden by 25× (I²R relationship):

Trade-offs:

Calibration and Testing

Factory Calibration

CTs are calibrated at specific burden points per IEC 61869-2:

Field Verification

Accuracy Test Setup

  1. Connect CT secondary to calibrated burden box set to actual burden
  2. Apply primary current at 5%, 20%, 100%, and 120% of rated (for metering CTs)
  3. Measure secondary current magnitude and phase angle
  4. Calculate ratio error and phase displacement
  5. Verify within specified accuracy class limits

Common Mistakes and Corrections

Mistake 1: Ignoring Temperature Effect

Problem: Cable resistance increases ~22% from 20°C to 75°C.

Correction: Always calculate burden at maximum operating temperature, not room temperature.

Mistake 2: Underestimating Connection Resistance

Problem: Multiple terminals, test switches, and connections add up.

Correction: Allow 0.05-0.1Ω total for all connections in burden calculation.

Mistake 3: Mixing Devices on Same CT

Problem: Connecting metering and protection devices in series increases burden and compromises both functions.

Correction: Use separate CT cores for metering and protection, or use tapped CTs with separate terminals.

Engineering Checklist

Design Phase

Installation Phase

Commissioning Phase

Conclusion

Secondary burden directly impacts CT accuracy and must be carefully calculated and controlled. Engineers who properly size CTs for actual burden, optimize cable selection, and verify burden during commissioning will achieve accurate metering and reliable protection performance.

Critical recommendation: Always calculate burden at maximum operating temperature (typically 75°C), not room temperature. A 20% margin is not sufficient—use 50% margin between rated output and actual burden.


Technical Reference: IEC 61869-1, IEC 61869-2, IEEE C57.13, ANSI C12


Related Products:
Documents you may also like:
Top